Some Things to Consider Before Dream Interpretation::
Some Things to Consider Before Dream Interpretation© 2000 Jonathan Zap
The phrase, “dream interpretation,” can be somewhat misleading. From my point of view dreams are not puzzles awaiting solution, but life experiences. Dream interpretation is at least as subjective and limiting as “life interpretation.” It would probably be meaningless, for example, to attempt an interpretation of what you did last Tuesday. But on some Tuesday there could be a dramatic episode of the sort that would later become a frequently repeated story or anecdote. These dramatic episodes could be subject to interpretations such as, “That certainly taught me never to believe that people are who they say they are.” Similarly, most of the dreams that people bring for dream interpretation are dramatic episodes where insistent meanings are breaking through from dream time to waking time. Interpretation is still subjective, but the dream may be tasking us to interpret it into the waking life.
No credible dream interpreter can claim to interpret every dream. Ninety percent of dreams that are brought for interpretation, however, have prominent archetypal elements which can be interpreted. The main validity test for dream interpretation is whether the interpretation resonates with the truth sense of the dreamer. If your dream falls into the ten percent that I cannot satisfactorily interpret, we can use the remaining time for I Ching or Zap Oracle consultation.
Dreams and “Reality”
The heart has a contraction phase and an expansion phase----systole and diastole----so too, all mammal incarnations seem to have a systole and diastole----waking and dreaming. Waking and dreaming are just two cases of our having a perception that something seems to be going on. Physics tells us that the seemingly solid objects of our waking life are actually patterned energy, that matter (as Einstein pointed out) is actually just a special case of energy. Also, we never sense anything but internal perceptions. For example, when I look at an object with my waking eyes I see ambient light reflected off the topography of its surface. That light passes through the simple convex lens of the cornea and appears upside down on the back of the retina. It is then turned right side up and otherwise interpreted by neurological processing. There is obviously a time gap between the object and this artifact of its existence (reflected light) reaching my eye and then being interpreted into perception. So what I see with my waking eyes is a neurological reconstruction of a past event. Spiritual teachings, philosophy, neurology and psychology are unanimous in telling us that we are never sure of what we’re looking at, that human perception means to look through a glass darkly at a thin slice of an edge of a multidimensional multiverse. So it is merely cultural prejudice to assume that the patterned energy we perceive in our waking life is “more real” than the patterned energy we perceive in the dreamtime.
Consider the case of a sleeping boy having a dream on a subway train. In the waking life this boy has the stereotyped bad step father----a sadistic, controlling personality who sees this boy’s whole existence as an irritation. Superficially, especially when others are present, he pretends to have the boy’s best interests at heart, etc. His mother tells him that he should love his step father and he is confused, he’s not sure what to think of him. In the boy’s dream his stepfather appears as a monster who turns into a human only when other adults are in the room. Meanwhile, back in the waking life, random strangers step on or off the subway, stations are announced, etc. Which is more “real,” what’s going on in the subway or what’s going on in the dream? If your point of view is meaningfulness or relevance to the boy, then the dream seems more “real.”
Nightmares
In classical antiquity it was believed that all dreams passed through two gates. Dreams that passed through the gate of ivory were pleasing but always false. Dreams that passed through the gate of horn were terrifying, but always true.
Dream theories are at least as unreliable as life theories. Sometimes, however, they may identify one of many possible functions that a dream can serve. Nightmares often seem to have a healing function that has much in common with the way homeopathic medicine works. If you have a lung infection, for example, the homeopath will give you a very dilute poison that attacks the lungs. There is a paradoxical mechanism at work here----the poison hopefully stimulates an immunological response that will overtake both poison and infection. Similarly, nightmares often seem to contain a homeopathic poison designed to stimulate a psychic immunological response that can ultimately create psychological/spiritual healing. For example, several times I have had people bring me almost the identical nightmare. They are hanging out a bar or a party and suddenly all the people around them turn into vampires. When questioned about their feelings surrounding the dream, the dreamer volunteers that they have a tendency to be self-destructively promiscuous. The nightmare reconditions this toxic habit so that when they are next in such a social setting they are much more appropriately wary and feel a nauseous gut response when some random stranger tries to pick them up.
>
